Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Hensley to SewerWatch: "No preference for the location"

"The moment I choose, I can be rid of Mr. Hyde."
-- Robert Louis Stevenson, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

I thought it would be an interesting question for Gordon Hensley, and, as usual, I was right.

After all, Hensley is THE "San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper," a local, "environmental" "group." (To clarify, according to the SLO Coastkeeper web site, the entire "organization" is just Hensley, so that's why I always have to add quotes around the word "group," or "organization," when referring to SLO Coastkeeper.) And, Hensley was also a member of the Los Osos Community Services District Board of Directors from 1998 - 2005, when he was recalled from office.

He was recalled from office, along with two other like-minded Directors, for his role in developing an extremely unpopular sewer plant, that was to be constructed in the middle of town... directly across the town's main street from homes. After he was recalled, that project, reasonably, was stopped.

Recent county analysis has shown that there are several other locations available for the facility that are downwind, out of town, and much cheaper to build on, and to operate a treatment facility.

Shortly after he was recalled from office, Hensley, through SLO Coastkeeper (and another one of his "groups," Taxpayers Watch), officially supported State legislation, eventually signed by the Governor, that transferred authority of the sewer project, from the LOCSD (that Hensley was recalled from), to the County of San Luis Obispo, in 2006.

As I first reported here on SewerWatch, that legislation -- AB 2701 -- was officially "supported" by seven "groups." Hensley's SLO Coastkeeper, and Taxpayers Watch were two of them.

Additionally, immediately after he was recalled from office, Hensley used his Taxpayers Watch "group" in a "four hearings over nine months" attempt to officially "dissolve" the very government agency that he was recently recalled from, the Los Osos Community Services District. That unsuccessful dissolution effort would wind up costing Taxpayers Watch over $40,000.

However -- and this is flat-out great -- since the release of the Los Osos wastewater project's draft Environmental Impact Report a few months back by county officials, I began to notice how, expectedly, nearly every local environmental agency in the county -- Surf Rider, Green Build, ECOSLO, The Sierra Club, just on and on, even the Farm Bureau -- was chiming in on where the treatment facility should be located. And, not one of those real environmental groups (you know, with, like, staffs) is in support of building the treatment facility at the location where CSD Director/SLO Coastkeeper Hensley spent some $25 million, and over five years prepping for a sewer plant.

Furthermore, while all of those real environmental groups were officially submitting their comments earlier this year, I also noticed how another certain "SLO" County environmental "group," that supposedly "keep"s the "Coast," and is "a program of Environment in the Public Interest" (whatever that means), was remaining conspicuously silent on the matter.

So, as you can understand, it occurred to me that it'd be very interesting to hear if SLO Coastkeeper's views regarding the location of the Los Osos wastewater treatment facility, aligned more closely with "their" fellow environmentalists, or with recalled CSD Director, Gordon Hensley.

"We...," (again, with the "We"), "We (SLO Coastkeeper) have no preference for the location, collection system, or disposal method the County ultimately chooses provided that the current water pollution comes to an end," Hensley wrote in an e-mail to SewerWatch.

(Did I mention that Hensley, as a Los Osos CSD Director, spent some $25 million, and over five years on an intensely controversial "location?")

Linda Sheehan, executive director of The California Coastkeeper Alliance (that works "on behalf of" SLO Coastkeeper, however, to be clear, SLO Coastkeeper, specifically, is just Hensley, according to his... errr... "their" web site), when contacted by SewerWatch, wrote, "I would not be familiar with the details of all the Keepers' work, as I focus on statewide issues on behalf of the Waterkeepers."

When asked if her organization is aware that Hensley was a former Los Osos CSD Director, recalled in 2005, Sheehan wrote, "Yes, we do know about that."

No word yet on whether recalled District Director Hensley shares the same indifference on the treatment facility location as SLO Coastkeeper Hensley.

###

[On a related note, I recently came across an excellent web site from Nipomo attorney, Guy Murray, that asks many of the same questions of SLO Coastkeeper, as SewerWatch -- i.e.: "You claim your group (SLO Coastkeeper) is essentially a watch dog group for government; but, who watches you?" Murray's excellent web site is linked here.]

5 Comments:

  • Ron, love ya baby, but I'm wondering, just who is it going to be cheaper for?
    The general populace (you included), or or folks who are in the PZ?
    Your post at Ann's most excellent blog:

    "And, since the passage of AB 2701, the next ten years will be on Los Osos's dime, for a change.

    [That's my favorite part of AB 2701 (that BOTH of Gordon Hensley's one-man "organizations" supported) -- the county just spent six million of LOS OSOS's money, and not COUNTY taxpayer money, for a change, proving my reporting right.

    Sweeeeeetness. Thanks, Gordo!"

    WTF??????

    BTW, I figured out that Gordon was a charlatan quite a while back, Does he even OWN a computer? his website is pathetically out of date.
    BTW#2 didn't the CSD board of directors also endorse the state law?
    I guess thats one of the unnamed seven.
    Put me in for the book, Chaio.

    By Blogger Mike Green, at 8:38 PM, March 24, 2009  

  • Hello Mike,

    Sorry about the delayed response, but ever since I incorporated my "hair-trigger-to-the-trash-can" policy for the "comments" of those three or four creepy people that used to post here incessantly, AND how I also deliberately ignored them hoping they would go away, well, it worked!

    Whooohooo!

    So now, I don't really check my comments anymore, but you ask a good question.

    When I wrote:

    "That's my favorite part of AB 2701 (that BOTH of Gordon Hensley's one-man "organizations" supported) -- the county just spent six million of LOS OSOS's money, and not COUNTY taxpayer money, for a change, proving my reporting right."

    What I was referring to was the $6 million that COUNTY taxpayers had to cough up for the design of the "ready to go" sewer project from 1998.

    As you know (exclusively through my reporting), that money was completely wasted when Los Osos voters fucked-up and listened to Nash-Karner in 1998, and voted to form the LOCSD so she could pursue her dead-on-arrival, "better, cheaper, faster" project.

    Shortly after Los Osos voters made her the #1 vote-getter that year for the LOCSD Board, she made the decision to toss the county's "ready to go" project in the trash dumpster so she could pursue her "better, cheaper, faster" project... that never worked.

    And that decision, resulting from Los Osos voters fucking up and listening to Nash-Karner, cost COUNTY taxpayers $6 million.

    So, these days, when I write, "the county just spent six million of LOS OSOS's money, and not COUNTY taxpayer money, for a change," what I mean is that, since Los Osos passed that 218 vote a couple of years ago, NOW Los Osos is on the hook for that cash, and not county taxpayers. So, if Los Osos voters fuck-up and listen to Nash-Karner again, COUNTY taxpayers won't get stuck with the bill... again.

    That's "WTF." ; - )

    Mike wrote:

    " Put me in for the book"

    Noted, and thanks!

    By Blogger Ron, at 9:03 AM, April 10, 2009  

  • "...three or four creepy people that used to post here..."

    ...three or four creepy people that use to post here...

    Damn, that one got me again.

    By Blogger Ron, at 9:12 AM, April 10, 2009  

  • One of them is encouraging posters to post comments about any new Sewerwatch blog entries over at Calhoun's Cannons blogsite since you're a big meany and keep dumping them. So there's a kinda weird connection going on. I post a poem the the 3-4 Creepies start chewing each other's ankles over something you've posted over here. Or I post my Can(n)on about something un-sewerish and there they are chewing on your ankle over something you've posted over here, but doing it over on my blog. Strange, I must say. Well, whatta ya gonna do with folks suffering from a bad case of Sewerish OCD.

    By Blogger Churadogs, at 7:03 AM, April 17, 2009  

  • Churadogs wrote:

    "... you're a big meany and keep dumping them."-

    I don't keep dumping "them," just that one, and it feels great.

    I see that creepy, anonaloser's "username" show up in my incoming e-mail, and I don't even read what they posted, I just take the less-than-ten-seconds to stop by here and dump it in the trash... feels great.

    But, the other two or three anonalosers suffering from a BAD case of Sewerish OCD, are still welcome to post... whatever it is they post, here.

    Chura:

    "Or I post my Can(n)on about something un-sewerish and there they are chewing on your ankle over something you've posted over here, but doing it over on my blog."-

    Creepy, huh? Sorry to hear that.

    By Blogger Ron, at 10:10 AM, April 17, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home