LOCSD's wastewater bond rating "suspended" by S&P Global Ratings
TO: Peter Kampa, Interim General Manager, Los Osos
CSD
Hello Mr. Kampa,
I'm researching a story, and I just have couple of quick
questions involving the municipal bonds that the LOCSD issued back in
2002/03 for the LOCSD's now-failed, "mid-town" wastewater
"project," and that are being paid off by "4,203"
Los Osos property owners (on their property tax bills) until the year
2033, as I first exposed in 2013, at this link:
Well, I recently read, at this link:
"SAN FRANCISCO (Standard&Poor's) March 13,
2015--Standard&Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'BBB-'
underlying rating (SPUR) on Los Osos Community Services District
Wastewater Assessment District No. 1, Calif.'s limited-obligation
improvement bonds outstanding and removed the rating from CreditWatch
with negative implications. The outlook is stable. 'The rating had
been placed on CreditWatch with negative implications on Dec. 15,
2014, due to the lack of timely information, a situation that the
district has since resolved,' said Standard&Poor's credit analyst
Misty Newland."
However, that report was published on "March 13, 2015,"
and, in a more recent report, dated, "June 21, 2016," at
this link:
... it reads:
"Los Osos Community Services District Wastewater
Assessment District No. 1, CA Rating Suspended On Lack Of
Information
SAN FRANCISCO (S&P Global Ratings) June 21, 2016--S&P Global Ratings has suspended its 'BBB-' underlying rating (SPUR) on Los Osos Community Services District Wastewater Assessment District No. 1, Calif.'s series 2002 limited obligation improvement bonds. At the same time, S&P Global Ratings has removed the rating from CreditWatch with negative implications. "This action follows repeated attempts by S&P Global Ratings to obtain timely information of satisfactory quality to maintain our rating on the securities in accordance with our applicable criteria and policies," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Kaiti Wang."
Here's my question: What happened there? Why is S&P Global
Ratings having so much trouble "obtaining timely information of
satisfactory quality" from the Los Osos CSD for something so
important as the more than $17 million in bonds that the LOCSD issued
back in 2003 for their now-failed "mid-town" sewer disaster,
and that more than 4,000 Los Osos property owners are stuck paying for
until the year 2033?
Is there all of a sudden a problem with securing the bonds? For
example, are more and more Los Osos property owners finally waking up
to what I first exposed at this link:
... that those property owners are stuck funding a fraud for the
next 18 years, and, therefore, understandably, they now refuse to pay
that fraudulent assessment -- a fraudulent assessment, for a
now-failed sewer disaster, and a fraqudulent assessment that is the
ONLY thing that is securing those bonds -- and, perhaps, have
contacted their attorneys, and THAT's why this: "Los Osos
Community Services District Wastewater Assessment District No. 1, CA
Rating Suspended On Lack Of Information?"
Is it that, or is it something else? I mean, what's the deal
there?
This whole mess smells really fishy.
I'm very curious to know the answer, because, on the District's
web site, at this link:
... it reads:
"District Transparency
As a local goverment [sic] agency, this Los Osos Community
Services District has a responsibility to remain transparent to the
public. We are held accountable by our community."
Well, this:
"This action follows repeated attempts by S&P Global
Ratings to obtain timely information (from the LOCSD) of satisfactory
quality to maintain our rating on the securities..."
... doesn't sound much like this:
"... a responsibility to remain transparent to the public.
We are held accountable by our community."
Any information you could supply me with on why, just a few weeks
ago, "S&P Global Ratings has suspended its 'BBB-' underlying
rating (SPUR) on Los Osos Community Services District Wastewater
Assessment District No. 1, Calif.'s series 2002 limited obligation
improvement bonds," would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Ron
P.S: This email posted to my blog, SewerWatch, at this
link:
Thanks again.
--
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
sewerwatch.blogspot.com
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home